AN INTELLIGENT DESIGN : CONTROLLED HOMINIZATION IN COSMIC APARTHEID

 

 

Controlled hominization of primates in cosmic apartheid to preserve intelligent life in the universe. Advanced ET could be doing so with us and expecting us to to likewise with other primates.  Fermi’s Paradox would so be solved.

 

 

 

 

 

Fermi’s Paradox? What does it mean exactly?

Our galaxy alone (the Milky Way) contains between 100 and 400 billions stars more or less like our sun, and with a mean number of 5 planets per star (the sun has 9 planets, 10 perhaps with a recent discovery), the Milky Way would then have some ~ 1000 billions, that is 10 12 or 1.000.000.000.000 planets !

 

There are probably billions of galaxies in the universe, and face to these astronomical figures, the Italian scientist and Physics Nobel Prize Enrico Fermi wondered on the absence of obvious extraterrestrial traces on our planet and in the Solar System. As a matter of fact, this raises many questions.

Before Galileo, medieval geocentrism placed the Earth at the centre of the universe. Could we do the same with man and intelligence? This anthropocentrism would not be wiser!                                                   

 >>>>>

It seems unlikely that life could only exist on our planet. Some stars in our galaxy were born billions of years before our Sun, and advanced stellar civilizations should therefore have colonized the whole galaxy in less than 100 millions years. This is an unsignificant length of time compared with the age of the universe  (~13,6 billions years).

Yet, extraterrestrial beings are not met on Earth! « Where are they ? ». So is Fermi’s Paradox.

Were they victims of a cosmic accident or of self-destruction, as it could happen to us ? Is their absence an ill omen for us? This site proposes a cosmic hypothesis which is quite disconcerting, but  not in  contradiction with present knowledge.

 

The Cosmos could destroy us anytime, and we are still daily increasing the risks of self-destruction through unrestricted consumption, pollution, etc. If consciousness means anything to us, man should face a cosmic problem in the following two hypotheses :

 

H1 : Man could nevertheless be alone in the universe ?  In this case, he should prove his cosmic consciousness and responsibility by acting so as to save life and intelligence on Earth and in this universe ! A more responsible cosmic behaviour is required from mankind.

 

H2 : But man could also not be alone ? Then, the best way to prove our responsibility to other more advanced stellar beings would be again to act as required to save life and intelligence on Earth and in the universe!

 

Alone or not, man should therefore prepare a cosmic descent to replace our species in the event of our death. Modern science and technology allow us to do so.

 

The primitive man had probably no doubt on the necessity to keep the fire burning. But is mankind willing to survive by preserving the flame of universal life and intelligence with a « cosmic assurance »? Our cosmic behaviour pleads so far against it !  >>>  Page +

 

 

 

 

General Index >>>

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Site Pages :

 

A cosmic duty : A Relay Required to Preserve  Life                    Cosmic apartheid on a « terraformed » planet     

 

A Permanent Training of Primates     Cosmic marriage of artificial beings      Do we have cosmic Parents ? 

 

Your comments >>> BLOG

 

Online Publication : Is Mankind Willing to Survive ?

 

It is proposed to terraform another solar planet in view to hominize a new species with terrestrial primates educated in cosmic apartheid. Advanced ET could have been playing a similar part with man since the beginning and be expecting him to do the same now, the preservation of universal life being obviously a cosmic duty for all intelligent species. Man’s refusal to do so would result in apocalyptic risks. There may be no other issue to our present problems of survival. But is mankind willing to survive?

 

1. An ET expectation  : If man is alone, a controlled hominisation of primates in cosmic apartheid would already give more chances of survival to universal intelligence. Advanced ET would expect man to do so           

 

2. A deliberate ET silence : ET observers would remain silent until man has proved that he will preserve intelligent life. Any dispersion of terrestrial life in the Cosmos would be made impossible without this demonstration.

 

3. A bad demonstration : Market fanaticism is exhausting our planet. The privileged few are behaving as if they were conquering a foreign planet on which man is not destined to survive.

                     

4. A puzzle construction : Man should prove that he will preserve intelligent life by “terraforming”’ a solar planet in view to promote a new intelligent species issued from terrestrial primates.

 

5. Controlled evolution : Masked interventions and use of remote control systems would allow to educate primates in cosmic apartheid.  A new science destined to make man invisible should be developed.

 

6. Apartheid education of primates : If the universe is already controlled by some sort of universal consciousness, this control should be maintained. If man is alone, he should prepare the birth of a universal consciousness through a peaceful dispersion of intelligent life and a supervision of a “bigbrother” type.

 

7. Toward an Artificial Being : Mankind’s survival requires an optimization of planetary gestion that is not compatible with market economy. Man’s mutation to an artificial being is the sole issue available.

 

8. A new model of universe :  Intelligence is wrongly ignored in the evolution of the universe  although  man  is already a local actor in it. Even if life is the result of random processes, the science of more advanced ET could already have allowed them to play a kind of godlike part in this evolution. The current ID/Darwin fight is a sterile continuation of an old philosophical debate between what is innate and what is acquired. A synthesis is however possible.